<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Incubus (1982) Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retroslashers.net/incubus-1982-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retroslashers.net/incubus-1982-review/</link>
	<description>Unearthing Forgotten Horror</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:18:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Francis</title>
		<link>http://retroslashers.net/incubus-1982-review/#comment-4136</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 22:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retroslashers.net/?p=10766#comment-4136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like THE INCUBUS a lot, too, but you guys should read the novel. The movie is 180 degrees from it. Both are excellent, however. John Cassavetes&#039; doctor is only a very minor character in the book. The &quot;hero&quot; was completely excised from the movie. And, it&#039;s more about biology, where as the Incubus is a person who actually transforms into this monstrous thing. The movie gives it a more ethereal origin, a entity residing in this kids subconscious, and the twist ending is handled much better in the novel. Having said all that, I STILL love the movie. Always will, and WILL BE upgrading my Elite DVD.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like THE INCUBUS a lot, too, but you guys should read the novel. The movie is 180 degrees from it. Both are excellent, however. John Cassavetes&#8217; doctor is only a very minor character in the book. The &#8220;hero&#8221; was completely excised from the movie. And, it&#8217;s more about biology, where as the Incubus is a person who actually transforms into this monstrous thing. The movie gives it a more ethereal origin, a entity residing in this kids subconscious, and the twist ending is handled much better in the novel. Having said all that, I STILL love the movie. Always will, and WILL BE upgrading my Elite DVD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://retroslashers.net/incubus-1982-review/#comment-4135</link>
		<dc:creator>glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 20:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retroslashers.net/?p=10766#comment-4135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good review. Most of the reviews I&#039;ve seen of this seem disappointed that it isn&#039;t a demonic Humanoids from the Deep.
The autopsy scenes are one of the few cases of dialog making a film much more queasy than anything they could have shown.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review. Most of the reviews I&#8217;ve seen of this seem disappointed that it isn&#8217;t a demonic Humanoids from the Deep.<br />
The autopsy scenes are one of the few cases of dialog making a film much more queasy than anything they could have shown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
